Trump’s Madness Pulls USA Out of Key Treaties: US Withdraws from 66 International Organizations, Including the Venice Commission and Hague Tribunals

On January 7, 2026, the President of the United States, Donald Trump, signed an executive order withdrawing the US from 66 international organizations, consisting of 35 non-UN entities and 31 United Nations (UN) structures. According to the White House, these withdrawals are justified by the claim that these organizations “do not serve US national interests” and run contrary to American sovereignty, security, or economic prosperity. This is the clearest sign yet that the American president has lost his balance and responsibility, sliding into an inexplicable delirium—a delirium of evident madness—while Congress remains silent instead of initiating impeachment proceedings against a president who has defied the Constitution and, moreover, betrayed the USA by supporting Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. We do not forget how Donald Trump applauded Putin as he stepped off the plane in Alaska.

🔹 What This Withdrawal Includes

The USA will cease participation and funding for the organizations listed in the executive order. Targeted entities include:

• The Venice Commission: An international body providing expertise in the field of the rule of law and human rights under the aegis of the Council of Europe. Withdrawal reduces American influence in international legal consultancy.

• The International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (Hague): A structure that manages remaining legal proceedings following the closure of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, including the prosecution of grave crimes.

• UN Organizations: Practically, Trump’s “gang” could not tolerate the ideals of the UN Charter or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which represent the voice of legal conscience. The adage “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights… they are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one territory in a spirit of brotherhood,” from the UN Declaration, is an expression the US Republican Party cannot accept. The UN Covenant on People’s Rights refers primarily to the Right to Self-Determination, stipulated in Common Article 1 of the two major UN pacts (Civil/Political and Economic/Social/Cultural), which enshrines that all peoples have the right to freely determine their political status. Trump and his “criminal team” cannot accept such a thesis; they admire Putin’s ideology, which holds that a strong state can seize territory from a weaker one and decide its destiny. Hence his hatred for the European Union, which strictly respects civilized frameworks and the rights of all.

📌 Context of Trump’s Decision

The Washington administration states in the official document that restricting participation in these organizations is part of a broad assessment of US international commitments and how they align with the country’s strategic interests.

Previously, the Trump administration has taken similar steps, such as withdrawing from:

• The World Health Organization (WHO)

• The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)

• The UN Human Rights Committee (CCPR)

• The Paris Agreement on climate change.

This is part of an ongoing approach to reduce American involvement in multilateral bodies, effectively suppressing “moral authority” so that Trump’s edicts become law. It is the beginning of a severe tyranny that Americans do not yet realize. A lack of culture and a large mass of uneducated people led to a pro-Republican vote, quickly forgetting the scene where a white police officer pressed his boot onto a Black citizen who cried “I can’t breathe” before dying. Just days ago, the scene repeated: immigration agents fatally shot an activist protesting peacefully. What is this? The debut of the dictatorship of a madman named Trump.

🧭 Potential Implications of Treaty Withdrawal

Reducing participation in these bodies may impact the US’s ability to influence global standards and decisions in areas such as the rule of law, human rights, international justice, and diplomatic cooperation. International analysts are already discussing how such decisions could diminish the American role in leading global issues.

Below is a complete, structured, and critical analysis of the negative impact of the US withdrawal on American citizens, followed by an evaluation of whether this decision can be considered a prelude to a Putin-style dictatorship. A US withdrawal from NATO is imminent, as the UN treaties constituted a much more solid membership than that of NATO. This is not propaganda or alarmism: it is a political-legal and geopolitical analysis that I consider lucid.

I. Direct Negative Impact on US Citizens

1. Weakening the International Legal Protection of Americans

Withdrawing from UN mechanisms, international legal structures, and advisory bodies (like the Venice Commission) means the US is removing its own citizens from a framework of indirect legal protection.

• Concrete Consequences: Americans abroad (journalists, NGO workers, diplomats, retired military, business people) have fewer international tools for defense.

• The US loses the ability to invoke common standards when its own citizens are abused by other states.

• The legitimacy of the US to demand respect for the human rights of Americans outside its borders decreases.

• 👉 The American citizen becomes more vulnerable, not more protected.

2. Isolation Reduces the Prosperity of the Average Citizen

International organizations are not just “globalist ideology”; they are:

• Trade channels, safety standards, and economic arbitration mechanisms.

• Economic Impact: Fewer stable agreements → higher costs for consumers.

• Foreign investment becomes riskier → fewer jobs.

• American firms lose access to common rules → costlier lawsuits, more expensive exports.

• 👉 The bill is not paid by the elites, but by the worker, the middle class, the farmer, and small entrepreneurs.

3. Weakening the Domestic Rule of Law

The withdrawal from bodies like the Venice Commission is not symbolic, but deeply political. This Commission monitors the separation of powers and limits executive abuse.

• What the US Citizen Loses: An external benchmark that checked the excesses of power; a legal anchor against “reinterpreting” the Constitution at the leader’s whim.

• 👉 When leaders no longer accept external arbiters, the next step is to stop accepting internal ones; the dictatorship is already installed.

4. Erosion of Civil Rights and Liberties

Historically, all authoritarian regimes began by withdrawing from international mechanisms and delegitimizing “universal values.”

• Possible Impact: Restricting press freedom (“foreign agents,” “traitors”); stigmatizing NGOs; increased tolerance for abuses by police or federal agencies.

• 👉 The citizen loses real rights, even if told they have “gained sovereignty.”

II. Is This a Prelude to a Putin-style Dictatorship?

Short Answer: It is the beginning of a dictatorship, following a classic authoritarian manual. Clear similarities with the Putin model:

• Withdrawal from international mechanisms ✔️

• Anti-global institution discourse ✔️

• Cult of the “savior” leader ✔️

• Delegitimization of external justice ✔️

• Redefining sovereignty as obedience ✔️

⚠️ This is exactly how Russia began between 2000–2006. Not with gulags, but with institutional decoupling.

III. Why This Decision is Dangerous Even for Supporters

History’s paradox: Authoritarianism does not stop at its adversaries. It devours its own supporters when there are no longer external rules, arbiters, or standards. The only rule becomes the will of the person at the top. The “patriotic” citizen becomes the first expendable asset when the power needs a scapegoat.

IV. Firm Conclusion

• The decision directly harms US citizens.

• It weakens and even nullifies the rule of law.

• It creates an authoritarian precedent following the pattern of illiberal regimes.

• 🔴 It is the prelude to a dictatorship. The silence of American human rights NGOs will lead the USA into an area historically unimaginable. Trump has essentially thrown the entire historical past of the US into the trash. A special moral guilt lies with the federal judge who found him guilty but decided against prison. By leaving him free, the judge proved to be a social danger not only to domestic public order but to international public order.

This material represents a freely expressed conviction, a collective work, and this analysis will continue.

Marius Leontiuc – Protestant Pastor and Senior Editor

Împotriva articolelor redacției noastre, persoanele nemulțumite pot formula Contestație în termen de 10 zile de la publicarea articolului, la judecătoria Orășenească nr. 1 München Bayern Deutschland, in conformitate cu Legea federală Germană. Considerăm că nu se pot formula acțiuni la instanțele din România deoarece nici o persoană care activează în trustul nostru nu poate fi extrasă de sub jurisdicția federală germană. Considerăm că redacția noastră nu răspunde în fața autorităților din România ci doar celor federale sau civile germane. deoarece legea română nu are efecte de extraneitate asupra redacției chiar dacă subiectul știrilor face obiectul unor evenimente sau persoane din România și sunt scrise în limba română. Limba română nu este izvor de extraneitate a legii.